Automation that gives people their hours back
The work nobody should be doing by hand: retyping between systems, chasing statuses, assembling the same report every Monday.
I answer within one working day, in writing. I never call.
When people come for this
- The same data is typed twice — once in the form, once in the system that actually matters.
- Requests get lost between mail, a messenger and someone’s memory.
- Documents are assembled by hand: an invoice, a contract, a delivery note, every one of them from a template and by copy-paste.
- Nobody knows the numbers until a person sits down and builds the report.
What is inside
The process on paper first
Before automating anything I write down how it runs now. Half the steps usually turn out to exist only because they always have.
Connections between systems
Site, CRM, mail, Telegram, tables, payments — so a record appears once and lands everywhere it is needed.
Documents on their own
Invoices, contracts, notes generated from the data instead of a template someone edits by hand each time.
Reminders that fire
The system watches for what stalled and says so — a request without an answer, a payment past its date.
Reports without a person
Numbers arrive on schedule in a message or a panel, instead of being assembled every Monday morning.
A place where errors are visible
When a connection breaks, that shows up as a message to you, not as silence and a missing order.
How the work goes
You describe the task
A short form: what the business does, what should change. No calls — I answer in writing, within one working day.
You get a quote
Within two working days, one figure for the whole scope, before any work starts. Not a range that doubles later.
You see the first screen
The opening screen as a layout, before anything is built. Wrong direction is cheap to fix here and expensive to fix later.
It gets built
Phone first, then desktop. Checked on a slow connection and on a real device, not only in a browser window.
It goes live
You get every access on day one: domain, hosting, analytics, the code. Nothing is held hostage.
What it costs
Automation is priced by the number of steps and by what has to be connected, not by hours spent. One figure for the whole scope within two working days — and if the honest answer is that a task is not worth automating, you get that answer instead of an invoice.
- How many steps the process has and how often it runs.
- What has to be connected, and whether those systems have an API at all.
- Whether documents are generated and in what format.
- Whether people keep a manual override — usually they should.
A factory that stopped losing requests
At PMP Group Stroy a request from the site or the chat now reaches Telegram in seconds and lands in the panel at the same time, with a reference number that keeps the follow-up questions attached to the right person. Nothing is retyped by hand, and nothing depends on whether somebody remembered to check the mailbox.
One niche, one country. What is promised here is the method, not somebody else’s numbers.
See the caseQuestions people ask
Will it break what already works?
The old way stays until the new one is proven on real work. Switching over is a decision, not a surprise.
What if a service changes its rules?
Then the connection is repaired — that is normal maintenance. Errors are visible by design, so it does not fail quietly for weeks.
Can it be done without changing our systems?
Usually yes: automation joins what you already run. Replacing everything is the last resort, not the first offer.
Will it replace people?
It replaces retyping. In every case so far the same people stayed and stopped doing the part they hated.
Do you call?
No. I answer in writing, within one working day, in the channel you left.
Get a price for your automation
Describe the routine that eats the most time — the figure comes within two working days.
Get a price